Dental Implants Occlusal Overload

Studies have established that occlusal overload frequently led to marginal bone loss or de-osseointegration of effectively osseointegrated implants. The crestal bone around dental implants might be a fulcrum for lever action whenever a bending moment is used, recommending that implants may well be more prone to crestal bone loss by mechanical pressure.

Factors connected with elevated bending overload in dental implants:

• Prostheses based on a couple of implants in the posterior region

• Straight alignment of implants

• Significant deviation from the implant axis in the type of action

• High crown/implant ratio

• Excessive cantilever length (>15 mm within the mandible, >10-12 mm within the maxilla)

• Discrepancy in proportions between your occlusal table and implant mind

• Para-functional habits, heavy bite pressure and excessive premature contacts (>180 µm in monkey studies, >100 µm in scientific testing on people)

• Steep cusp inclination

• Poor bone strength and density/quality

• Insufficient quantity of implants

The cortical bone is proven to be least resistant against shear pressure, that is considerably elevated by bending overload. The finest bone loss was seen around the tension side. Based on Von Recum, when two materials of various moduli of elasticity are put along with no intervening material and something is loaded, a stress contour increase is observed in which the two materials first enter into contact. Photoelastic and three-D finite element analysis studies shown V- or U-formed stress designs with greater magnitude near the purpose of the very first contact between implant and also the photoelastic block, which is comparable to the first crestal bone loss phenomenon. Misch stated the stresses in the crestal bone could cause microfracture or overload, leading to early crestal bone loss throughout the very first year of function, and also the alternation in bone strength from loading and mineralisation after twelve months alters the strain-strain relationship and reduces the chance of microfracture throughout the next years.

Wiskott and Belser referred to deficiencies in osseointegration credited to elevated pressure around the osseous mattress throughout implant positioning, establishment of the physiological biological width, stress shielding and insufficient sufficient structural integration between your load-bearing implant surface and also the surrounding bone. They centered on the value of the connection between stress and bone homeostasis. With different study by Frost, five kinds of strain levels related with various load levels within the bone were referred to:

1) Disuse, bone resorption
2) Physiological load, bone homeostasis
3) Mild overload, bone mass increase
4) Pathological overload, irreversible bone damage
5) Fracture

The idea of “microfracture” was suggested by Roberts et al., who came to the conclusion that crestal regions around dental implants are high-stress-bearing areas. They described when the crestal region is overloaded throughout bone re-designing, “cervical cratering” is produced around dental implants. The research suggested axially directed occlusion and progressive loading to avoid microfracture throughout the bone-re-designing periods.

Progressive loading on dental implants throughout healing stages was initially referred to by Misch within the eighties to lower early implant bone loss and early implant failure. In line with the concept, progressive loading must be used to permit the bone to create, redesign and mature to face up to stress without harmful bone loss by staging use of diet, occlusal contacts, prosthesis design and occlusal materials. Appleton et al. reported home loan business crestal bone reduction in progressively loaded implants, in comparison with implants without progressive loading, inside a similar healing and loading period. Additionally, digital radiographs indicated a rise in bone strength and density within the crestal 40 % from the implant within the progressive loaded crowns.

Greater crestal bone loss observed in the 1st of function in comparison with following years could be described with a reduced occlusal overload or elevated potential to deal with occlusal overload following the newbie of function together with a functional adaptation from the dental musculature, put on from the prosthesis material, and/or a rise in bone strength and density following a certain period of time.

For more information on the best possible Prosthodontic and Dental Implant Treatment for your case, please consult your Dentist. “There is no online material nor website that can substitute for professional advice.”

Albretsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A: The long term efficacy of currently used implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Imp, 1:11-25, 1986

Written by:
Dental Implants Cost+
Send your questions about Dental Implants Occlusal Overload through our Google Plus account linked above.
Dental Implants Cost –

    • Calvin
    • Feb 23rd. 2012 5:20pm

    Implantation is like a long term battle. But at the end of the day it worths to take the chance in a long run.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

%d bloggers like this: